stevco123 wrote: Tue Dec 31, 2024 11:41 am
A bushfire is good for the bush. An ecological treasure will become even better after this.
Not that simple unfortunately. Type of bush, intensity and frequency are the issue. Moderate intensity fires, with many years between, are basically good (even necessary) for most sclerophyll forests. However, too frequent, e.g. some of the alpine fires in recent decades which burnt Alpine Ash seedlings before they had a chance to seed themselves, are landscape changing - and for the worse IMO. Likewise fires that are hot enough to burn into rainforest where they're not 'meant' to occur. Antarctic beech (such as in rainforest gullies in the Otways), Tassie's pencil pine, etc. have no strategy to come back from fire. Once they're gone, they're gone.
That's all before we consider the loss of property, livestock, crops, endangered wildlife, and even human life.
Meanwhile, we are finishing the year on 530.5mm here, vs an average of 830mm. Our driest year since at least 1996, when we moved up here. Tinder dry.
I'm with you on this one Lighthouse. Praying that this next system delivers something for at least some of western Vic, but after so many east-centric systems, I wish I could be more confident
.